#1 on Buyer Prompts, 97% Citation Rate: Cursor, Claude, and Codex Workshop Results
Last 30 days on live commercial prompt sets, all three workshop brands rank #1 of 51 training competitors. When models mention them, they cite our own domains, not vendor docs or YouTube.
What rank do the workshop brands hold on buyer prompts?
Last 30 days, on the live commercial prompt sets: the questions a buyer actually types when sourcing a private AI coding workshop for their engineering team.
| Brand | Rank | Our mentions (30d) | Who we beat on the same prompts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Workshop | #1 of 51 | 51 | NobleProg 19, EY 13, Coursera 11, Scrimba 8, AI Hero 6 |
| Cursor Workshop | #1 of 51 | 39 | DataCamp 3, NobleProg 2, Coursera 2. Maven, Section AI, and Parlance Labs: 0. |
| Codex Workshop | #1 of 51 | 32 | DataCamp 4, NobleProg 3, Pluralsight 3 |
Claude Workshop is the hard one. Those prompts collide with established consultancies and academies, and we still lead the mention count. Cursor and Codex sit in a thinner category: almost nobody else answers “private Codex CLI workshop for 10–20 engineers,” so we hold it outright.
Reading the three brands separately
Claude Workshop competes on the most crowded prompt set of the three. NobleProg, EY, and Coursera all show up because “Claude Code training for engineers” overlaps with general corporate AI upskilling, a category consultancies already sell into. Leading that set by a wide margin is a stronger signal than leading a category nobody else has entered yet.
Cursor Workshop and Codex Workshop tell the opposite story. On their prompt sets, DataCamp, NobleProg, and Pluralsight show up with single-digit mention counts, and brands like Maven, Section AI, and Parlance Labs do not show up at all. That is a share of voice advantage that comes from being early to a specific prompt, not from outspending anyone.
When models mention us, do they cite our domains?
Yes. When ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Google AI mention the workshop brands, they now point at our sites first, not just at vendor docs or YouTube explainers.
| Brand | Mentions (90d) | Citation events | Owned-domain citations | Citation rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Workshop | 410 | 4671 | 943 | 96% |
| Cursor Workshop | 429 | 4864 | 1265 | 97% |
| Codex Workshop | 164 | 1882 | 422 | 99% |
Citation rate and citation event volume measure different things. Citation rate is the share of mention-bearing answers that link back to an owned domain at least once. Citation events count every individual link in every answer, including answers that cite the same page more than once or cite it again across repeated prompt runs, which is why citation event totals (1,882 to 4,864 across the three brands) run well ahead of the 90-day mention counts (164 to 429).
Mentions by AI engine (last 90 days)
Citation events: owned domain vs third-party
Unique prompts tracked per brand
Completed query runs per brand
ChatGPT is the volume engine on citation events (2,113 / 2,067 / 650 across Cursor, Claude, and Codex Workshop in the 90-day window). Perplexity and Google AI split the remainder.
Why owned-domain citations matter beyond the ranking
A mention without a citation is a brand name in passing. A mention with a citation is a link a reader can click straight from the AI answer to the workshop page that converts them. At 96–99% citation rates across the three brands, almost every answer that recommends a Harness Institute workshop also hands the reader a direct path to book one, instead of routing them to a reseller listing or a stale forum thread. That is the practical argument for tracking AI visibility as its own channel rather than treating AI answers as unmeasurable exposure.
What role does Harness Institute play?
Harness Institute (harness.institute) is the umbrella operator: the institute brand that runs Cursor Workshop, Claude Workshop, and Codex Workshop from a single Reaudit MCP session in Cursor. The institute site is a meta-brand for multi-brand AI visibility operations, not a fourth ranking story on buyer prompts.
The operational win is simpler than that: switch projects inside MCP, pull competitor matrices, and read citation analytics for three commercial workshop properties without leaving the editor.
Frequently asked questions
What is the citation rate for Cursor Workshop?
97% over the last 90 days: 429 brand mentions, 4,864 citation events, and 1,265 of them landing on cursorworkshop.com. Models cite our domain in almost every answer that mentions the brand.
Who are the main competitors on Claude Workshop prompts?
On the same commercial prompt set (51 tracked competitors), Claude Workshop leads with 51 mentions in 30 days. NobleProg, EY, Coursera, Scrimba, and AI Hero appear on overlapping prompts, but all with lower mention counts.
How many prompts does each workshop brand track?
Cursor Workshop: 76 unique prompts, 379 query runs. Claude Workshop: 87 prompts, 498 runs. Codex Workshop: 20 prompts, 128 runs. Combined: 183 prompts, 1,005 runs.
What is the difference between a brand mention and a citation event?
A mention is one AI answer that names the brand. A citation event is one link inside an answer, and a single mention can carry several citation events if the model links to more than one page, or if the same prompt is re-run on a schedule and produces the citation again. See AI brand mentions for the full definition.
Can I run multiple brands from one Reaudit account?
Yes. Harness Institute runs four related projects from one account, switching the active project context inside MCP. Each project keeps its own competitors, prompts, and citation analytics.
Related reading
Want results like Harness Institute?
See what Reaudit finds for your brand
Fifteen minutes, your own account, your real competitors, and the prompts your buyers actually type into ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI. No generic deck, just your numbers.