The real objections buyers raise about their AI search visibility, answered with the data from anonymized Reaudit audits. Every entry: the objection, the reality, the lesson.
“Rejection is a growth hormone.”
“Our client asked us about Reaudit, but we’ll check internally.”
Brands are asking their agencies for Reaudit. That pull is the most valuable signal you have. But agencies stall, because a tool that turns AI visibility into a hard number grades their homework. The fix isn’t closing agencies harder. It’s selling to the right buyer.
“We’re going to try Soro instead, it’s only $39 a month.”
A prospect is testing Soro at $39 a month. Soro generates articles and posts. That is it. No tracking of where AI mentions you, no on-page optimization, no go-to-market strategy, no unified analytics, no bot-crawl visibility. Content without measurement is guessing.
“We use Otterly for that.”
Otterly is AI search tracking. That is one tile of the job. Reaudit tracks too, then runs the strategy, content, revenue attribution, and code fixes that actually move the number, all operable from an MCP.
“Do you offer a free trial?”
A prospect asked for a free trial before committing. We don’t offer one, on purpose. Reaudit delivers value from first login, and we lead with a free AI brand visibility report. A real, anonymized one is embedded below.
“How do you measure AI visibility reliably when models are non-deterministic?”
Any single AI answer can change run to run. But across hundreds of runs and 8 models, mention rate, share of voice, citation rate, and sentiment form trends you can actually act on.