Are we mentioned at all?
The share of category prompts where an AI engine names you. If you are absent here, nothing else matters yet: you are not in the consideration set.
How often AI engines mention your brand, whether what they say is accurate, and how you compare to the competitors named alongside you.
Part of Reaudit · platform intelligence with a human decision at every step
Brand visibility measures what AI engines say about your brand, not only whether they say it. It is the brand, comms and PR counterpart to AI visibility: the same answer data, read for accuracy, sentiment, narrative and share of voice against the competitors named in the same answer.
Four questions, in order. Each one only matters if the one before it is answered.
The share of category prompts where an AI engine names you. If you are absent here, nothing else matters yet: you are not in the consideration set.
Engines state pricing, features, and policies as fact. When those claims are stale or invented, every buyer who asks gets the wrong answer, and you never see the conversation.
The framing around your name: confident, hedged, or negative. A high mention rate with poor sentiment is a reputation problem wearing the costume of a win.
Share of voice against the competitors named in the same answers. This is the number that tells you whether you are gaining or losing ground in your category.
Presence and position across engines, tracked as metrics over time. The question an SEO or growth team is trying to move.
Explore AI VisibilityAccuracy, sentiment, and narrative. The question a brand, comms, or PR team is accountable for. A brand can score well on one and badly on the other.
Explore Brand AlignmentBrand Alignment checks every factual claim against your own verified content and traces each wrong answer to the page it came from.
Actual Reaudit perception scorecard; example scores and claim used for this preview.
Engines keep quoting the old number long after you changed it, because the page they learned it from is still cached or still live.
New capabilities go unmentioned for months. Deprecated ones get recommended to buyers who then ask your sales team for something that no longer exists.
Refund windows, SLAs, and trial terms get confidently invented from adjacent sources or competitor pages.
Separate opinion from fact. "Popular with agencies" is not verifiable; "costs $99/month" is, and that is what gets checked.
Every factual claim is compared to your own verified content, then each wrong answer is traced to its source: one of your own pages, a competitor, or a third-party site.
Re-sample on a schedule. Generative answers are non-deterministic, so a single re-check proves nothing; a trend does.
Explore published client results, with the source and measurement shown in each case study.
Brand visibility in AI search is how often, how accurately, and how favourably AI engines such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Claude describe your brand when someone asks a question in your category. It combines four things: whether you are mentioned at all, whether the claims made about you are true, the sentiment of the framing, and your share of voice against the competitors named in the same answer.
An AI brand mention is any time an engine names your brand in a generated answer. It is distinct from a citation, where the engine links to your domain as a source. Mentions measure whether you are in the consideration set; citations measure whether the model treated your own content as evidence. A brand can be mentioned constantly without ever being cited, which usually means other people are describing you and you are not.
They are measured from the same underlying data but answer different questions. AI visibility asks how much: presence and position across engines, tracked as metrics over time, which is what an SEO or growth team moves. Brand visibility asks what is being said: accuracy, sentiment, and narrative, which is what a brand, comms, or PR team is accountable for. A brand can score well on one and badly on the other.
Traditional brand monitoring watches published media (articles, posts, reviews) that already exist and can be read. AI brand monitoring watches answers that are generated fresh for each user, stated as fact, usually without a visible source, and never archived anywhere you can search. You have to sample the engines with a fixed prompt set on a schedule, because there is no feed to subscribe to and no index to query.
Not directly: there is no edit button on a generated answer. What you can do is find the source the engine is reading and fix that. Wrong claims usually trace back to one of three places: a stale page of your own, a competitor, or a third-party site. Correcting your own pages is fastest; the others need outreach or new content that outranks them as a source. Then you re-sample on a schedule to confirm the answer actually changed.
Weekly for an active brand. Generative answers are non-deterministic: the same prompt can return different brands and different claims on consecutive runs, so a single check tells you almost nothing. Repeated sampling on a fixed cadence is what separates a real shift from noise. Reaudit reports mention rates with Wilson 95% confidence intervals across scheduled runs for exactly this reason.
See the evidence, choose the action and move forward with the platform or with our team.